Comments on: The future of frameworks http://jimbarritt.com/non-random/2009/02/08/the-future-of-frameworks/ adventures in code Sun, 04 Sep 2011 07:24:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Jim Barritt http://jimbarritt.com/non-random/2009/02/08/the-future-of-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-6855 Jim Barritt Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:29:57 +0000 http://jimbarritt.com/non-random/2009/02/08/the-future-of-frameworks/#comment-6855 Hi Pat, Thanks for the comment. Intereting idea about frameworks calling you and you calling libraries. I have started a post with some more detail about what it was we liked / didnt like about restlet which might be of some help. Hi Pat,

Thanks for the comment. Intereting idea about frameworks calling you and you calling libraries.

I have started a post with some more detail about what it was we liked / didnt like about restlet which might be of some help.

]]> By: Pat http://jimbarritt.com/non-random/2009/02/08/the-future-of-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-6823 Pat Mon, 09 Feb 2009 08:45:14 +0000 http://jimbarritt.com/non-random/2009/02/08/the-future-of-frameworks/#comment-6823 Hi Jim, Glad to hear about your experiences with Restlet. We had been thinking of using it and sounds like something to avoid for now. Also, if the framework were more about providing a platform for a framework, I'd probably call it a library :-) I believe I remember someone talking about frameworks call your code, vs libraries where you call them... or something like that. Hi Jim,

Glad to hear about your experiences with Restlet. We had been thinking of using it and sounds like something to avoid for now.

Also, if the framework were more about providing a platform for a framework, I’d probably call it a library :-) I believe I remember someone talking about frameworks call your code, vs libraries where you call them… or something like that.

]]>